Subscription Services: Subscribe | Change | Unsubscribe | RSS
Advertising Media Kit: Introduction | Rates | Testimonial | Contact
Miscellaneous: Reference Desk | Sitemap

Conservation Groups Sue U.S. Navy To Halt Training Near Endangered Whales; 'Playing Russian Roulette'

print this print      Bookmark and Share   RSS 2.0 feed

PLYMOUTH, Massachusetts -- WDCS, the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, has teamed with US based conservation groups today challenged the U.S. Navy’s decision to build its $100 million Undersea Warfare Training Range next to the only known calving ground for the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale. Along with the Southern Environmental Law Center, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Humane Society of the United States, and nine other conservation groups, WDCS has brought the challenge.

“Right whales shouldn’t be subjected to the threats that accompany this range – ship strikes, entanglement and noise disturbance - in the only place in the world where vulnerable females give birth to and care for their calves,” said Catherine Wannamaker, an attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center. “While we recognize the Navy’s need to train, there are ways to accommodate that need without introducing multiple risks of harm into such a sensitive area.”

The project threatens the already precarious survival of right whales by compounding the threats of vessel strikes and noise disturbances--into an area critical to mothers and calves.

“The people of the southeast who welcome the return of the right whales each year know all too well the gruesome results when one is struck by a ship,” said Sierra Weaver, attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. “This project will almost certainly increase that threat, and yet the National Marine Fisheries Service, the agency in charge of protecting the whales, has given the Navy a green light.”

The legal challenge alleges that the Navy and the National Marine Fisheries Service failed to study the environmental impacts of building and operating the training range at this location. The Navy decided to construct the range now, even though it acknowledges that more research needs to be done on the range’s environmental impacts before operations can begin. In documents filed with the court, the groups argue that the agencies must first address the impacts from operating the range before deciding to construct it.

“The Navy’s decision to shoot first and study the environmental impacts of using this facility later simply makes no sense,” said Sharon Young, field director of The HSUS. “The Navy is playing Russian roulette with one of our most imperiled wildlife species.”

As part of the planned training, Navy ships – exempt from speed restrictions designed to protect right whales – would pass through the calving grounds when traveling between the proposed training area and bases at Jacksonville, FL, and Kings Bay, GA. Ship strikes are the single largest cause of death for right whales with at least eight right whales killed in the past six years, including three pregnant females.

Ship traffic in the calving grounds is of particular concern since data suggests female right whales are struck more often, possibly because they must spend more time at the surface with their calves which have undeveloped lung capacities. Scientists believe that the loss of even one right whale a year from non-natural causes could jeopardize the future of the species.

After laying cables through the 500 square nautical mile training area, the Navy plans to conduct 470 annual exercises on the training range with up to three vessels and two aircraft deploying exercise torpedoes, parachutes and sonobuoys, and sonar and other noise pollution. This was done despite strong concerns expressed by the States of Georgia and Florida, conservation groups, and scientists. The Navy has proceeded with its plans without implementing recommended measures that could have lessened the impact of its activities.

“Using the suggested measures to minimize impacts is not going to reduce effectiveness of the Navy, but it could well save a species from extinction.” said Regina Asmutis-Silvia, WDCS Senior Biologist.

The challenge was filed today in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia by Defenders of Wildlife, The Humane Society of the United States, Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for a Sustainable Coast, Florida Wildlife Federation, North Carolina Wildlife Federation, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, Animal Welfare Institute, Ocean Mammal Institute, Citizens Opposing Active Sonar Threats, and Cetacean Society International. The groups are represented by attorneys from Southern Environmental Law Center, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, and Natural Resources Defense Council.

Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of, its staff or its advertisers.

Privacy Policy     © Copyright 2021 All rights reserved