Subscription Services: Subscribe | Change | Unsubscribe | RSS
Advertising Media Kit: Introduction | Rates | Testimonial | Contact
Miscellaneous: Reference Desk | Sitemap

Scientists Assess Radioactivity In The Ocean From Japan Nuclear Power Facility

print this print      Bookmark and Share   RSS 2.0 feed

ARLINGTON, Virginia -- With current news of additional radioactive leaks from the Fukushima nuclear power plants, the impact on the ocean of releases of radioactivity from the plants remains unclear.

But a new study by U.S. and Japanese researchers analyzes the levels of radioactivity discharged in the first four months after the accident.

It draws some basic conclusions about the history of contaminant releases to the ocean.

The study was conducted by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution chemist Ken Buesseler and two colleagues based in Japan, Michio Aoyama of the Meteorological Research Institute and Masao Fukasawa of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

They report that discharges from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plants peaked one month after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami that precipitated the nuclear accident, and continued through at least July.

Their study finds that the levels of radioactivity, while high, are not a direct threat to humans or marine life, but cautions that the effect of accumulated radionuclides in marine sediments is poorly known.

The release of radioactivity from Fukushima--both as atmospheric fallout and direct discharges to the ocean--represents the largest accidental release of radiation to the ocean in history.

Concentrations of cesium-137, a radioactive isotope with a 30-year half-life, at the plants' discharge points to the ocean peaked at more than 50 million times normal/previous levels.

Concentrations 18 miles offshore were higher than those measured in the ocean after the Chernobyl accident 25 years ago.

This is largely related to the fact, says Buesseler, that the Fukushima nuclear power plants are located along the coast, whereas Chernobyl was several hundred miles from the nearest salt water basins, the Baltic and Black Seas.

However, due to ocean mixing processes, the levels are rapidly diluted off the northwest coast of Japan.

The study used data on the concentrations of cesium-137, cesium-134 and iodine-131 as a basis to compare the levels of radionuclides released into the ocean with known levels in the sea surrounding Japan prior to the accident.

The resulting paper, Impacts of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants on Marine Radioactivity, is published in the current issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Buesseler was awarded a rapid-response grant from the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Division of Ocean Sciences to establish baseline concentrations of radionuclides in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

"Understanding and management of the long-term geochemical fate and ecological consequences of radiochemical contamination of the sea is dependent on our knowledge of the initial conditions," says Don Rice, director of NSF's Chemical Oceanography Program. "Acquiring that knowledge depends on our ability to deploy experts to the scene with minimal delay."

The investigators compiled and analyzed data on concentrations of cesium and iodine in ocean water near the plants' discharge points.

The data were made public by TEPCO, the electric utility that owns the plants, and the Japanese Ministry of Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

The team found that releases to the ocean peaked in April, a fact they attribute to "the complicated pattern of discharge of seawater and freshwater used to cool the reactors and spent fuel rods, interactions with groundwater, and intentional and unintentional releases of mixed radioactive material from the reactor facility."

The scientists also found that the releases decreased in May by a factor of 1,000, "a consequence of ocean mixing and a primary radionuclide source that had dramatically abated," they report.

While concentrations of some radionuclides continued to decrease, by July they were still 10,000 times higher than levels measured in 2010 off the coast of Japan.

This indicates that the plants "remain a significant source of contamination to the coastal waters off Japan," the researchers report.

"There is currently no data that allow us to distinguish between several possible sources of continued releases," says Buesseler.

"These most likely include some combination of direct releases from the reactors, or storage tanks or indirect releases from groundwater beneath the reactors or coastal sediments, both of which are likely contaminated from the period of maximum releases."

Buesseler says that at levels indicated by these data, the releases are not likely to be a direct threat to humans or marine biota in the surrounding ocean waters.

There could be an issue, however, if the source remains high and radiation accumulates in marine sediments.

"We don't know how this might affect benthic marine life, and with a half-life of 30 years, any cesium-137 accumulating in sediments or groundwater could be a concern for decades to come," he says.

While international collaborations for comprehensive field measurements to determine the full range of radioactive isotopes released are underway, says Buesseler, it will take some time before results are available to fully evaluate the impacts of this accident on the ocean.

The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation also funded the research.

Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of UnderwaterTimes.com, its staff or its advertisers.

Reader Comments

4 people have commented so far. cloud add your comment

The problem with this article is it is long on hyperbole and really short on understanding of what the measurements mean. . The use of weasel words like "not likely" is another way of saying nothing is harmful at the measured amounts. Lets put this report into something anybody can understand. You are standing in the middle of the Sahara, you drop a penny into the sand. Suddenly the sand, trillions of tons, measures a copper concentration 10,000 times more than normal. The measured amounts are extremely low compared to other radiation naturally occurring in the ocean, something the writers neglect to mention in favor of hyperbole. What is also lacking is a sense of proportion. 10,000 Americans die from oil and coal plant emissions every year, Zero die from Nuclear plant emissions. A ratio likely to occur worldwide. In Japan nobody died, nobody will die from the radiation release, yet thousands die every year from the oil and coal power plant emissions yet people worry about nuclear and not conventional.
   comment# 1   - michael hunt · New York, USA · Dec 15, 2011 @ 9:48pm

we must be very careful to monitor "everything" in next couple of years by the effect of accumulated radionuclides in marine life. We know one truth that nobody knows what will happen.
   comment# 2   - Sukeraba · NYC, NY · Dec 16, 2011 @ 5:47am

I totally agree, Michael. Add to your comment that we can now measure the tiniest amounts of "Toxic chemicals" while having no idea of the impact, if any, on life. Couple that with the fact that natural background radiation (Such as found in a typical brick home, or a coal mine, or as received on a trans-US airplane trip or a chest/dental x-ray) is believed to be a major factor in human evolution.
   comment# 3   - Don · United States · Dec 16, 2011 @ 2:00pm

Fukushima is not over yet. It is the worst nuclear disaster that the world has ever seen, a triple melt-down, melt-through, and melt-out. The real problem is that trillions of becquerels of radiation have been released into the ocean, and into the air. So much radiation has been released that the entire Northern hemisphere has been contaminated. Nuclear plant emissions do not cause immediate death, rather they cause cancer and illness to occur long after exposure.
   comment# 4   - Jack Trevally · Columbia USA · Dec 23, 2011 @ 4:20pm
Add your comment


characters left

*required field.
Note: Comments are posted if they are not abusive and are compliant with our Terms and Conditions. Comments with foul language will be deleted without exception.

   


bottom_left
bottom_right
Privacy Policy     © Copyright 2019 UnderwaterTimes.com. All rights reserved