WASHINGTON, D.C. -- NOAA announced today that seven stocks have been removed from the overfishing list and no new stocks added in their annual report to Congress on the status of fishing stocks.
The report tracks both population levels and harvest rates for species caught in federal waters between three and 200 miles off U.S. coasts. This year’s report indicates that seven stocks have been removed from the overfishing list, four stocks have increased population levels and are no longer overfished, and three stocks are now listed as fully “rebuilt.”
“This is great news for the American people and for the scientists who devote their lives to the study of fish populations,” said Jim Balsiger, NOAA acting assistant administrator for NOAA’s Fisheries Service. “Ending overfishing on these stocks and preventing overfishing from occurring on others is critical to maintaining and rebuilding our valuable fisheries resources, and this year we took a giant step forward in this regard.”
NOAA’s Fisheries Service and the eight regional fishery management councils took significant steps toward ending “overfishing” — when too many fish in a species are caught in a year — and rebuilding stocks in 2007.
Among the report’s findings:
“No new stocks were subject to overfishing in 2007, which is very good news as well,” Balsiger said. “The economic, recreational and ecological stakes for sustaining these resources are incredibly high.
“NOAA fisheries scientists constantly are learning more all the time about how to help fish populations,” he added. “Our agency is working hard to end overfishing by 2010, as required by the Magnuson Stevens Act. Continued and new sustainable management practices such as annual catch limits are one of the tools we are using.”
NOAA recently proposed guidelines to establish catch limits and targets for each stock to prevent overfishing. These annual catch limits are the amount of fish allowed to be caught in a year, and are required by a 2007 amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Additionally, the act calls for measures to ensure these limits are followed and do not exceed the scientific recommendations made by the regional fishery management councils’ scientific committees.
Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of UnderwaterTimes.com, its staff or its advertisers.
Reader Comments
1 person has commented so far.progress?? i was wondering if the world was even capable, japan certainly isn't, no that's not fair but i am starting to just not care
comment# 1 - mandy · haven USA · Jun 29, 2008 @ 7:56am